Skip to content

The Expressionist

Menu
  • Home
  • Music
    • Album of the Month
    • Song of the week
  • Art
    • Artist of the Month
    • Art work of the week
  • About
  • Contact
  • Search
Menu

Album of the Month April 2023

Posted on June 16, 2023June 16, 2023

Hype. It’s a bitch. Ascending mediocre bands to heights of unwarranted popularity, and smacking the truly great down to “critics’ pet” status, hype has become a plague on any band hoping to achieve unbridled adoration among music elitists. When the media hounds smell success and respond with their annual cry of “saviors of rock and roll,” disappointment is inevitable. So it goes with the Strokes, a band that’s seen enough publicity in 2001 to make bin Laden jealous.

Touted by the press as “the forefathers of a bold new era in rock,” “the greatest rock band since the Rolling Stones” and “the second coming of the Velvet Underground,” the Strokes have nowhere to go but out of style. And the album only came out last week! So why all the fanfare? Are they really that good? Of fucking course not. There is no bold new era in rock; the Rolling Stones have yet to be contended with; and if there ever is a second coming of the Velvet Underground, they won’t be doing second-rate imitations of Lou Reed.

The Strokes are not deities. Nor are they “brilliant,” “awe-inspiring,” or “genius.” They’re a rock band, plain and simple. And if you go into this record expecting nothing more than that, you’ll probably be pretty pleased. See, while I can’t agree with the Strokes’ messianic treatment, I’d be lying if I said I thought Is This It was anything other than a great rock record.

What’s refreshing to me about the Strokes is that, in a musical climate where even the dirtiest garage bands can create the illusion of million-dollar studio techniques through sound filters on mom’s Packard-Bell, the Strokes prefer to rock in the classic vein: no laser sounds, no ethereal reverb, no pre-programmed Aphex beats. Their influences are so firmly rooted in the post-punk tradition that it’s as if the last two decades had never occurred. The same names are always dropped: the Velvet Underground, Television, the Stooges. And while the Velvets are obviously a major source of inspiration, the Strokes’ only similarity to Television and the Stooges is the confidence with which they play.

Frontman Julian Casablancas’ vocals bear more than a passing resemblance to early Lou Reed, but where Reed seemed to accidentally dispense life-changing lyrics through a drugged drawl, Julian sings about the simple trivialities of big-city life with stark lucidity. These songs revolve around frustrated relationships, never coming near to approaching anything that might resemble insight. Yet, with Casablancas’ self-assured, conversational delivery, and the almost primal energy of the four guys backing him, attention shifts from the simply present lyrics to the raging wall of melody these guys bang out like it’s their lifeblood.

Recent Posts

  • Rijksmuseum welcomes Rembrandt’s €175m ‘The Standard Bearer’ with free entry on Saturday
  • U.K. Museum Recovers 15th-Century Altar Panel Almost 50 Years After It Was Stolen
  • Why Picasso Guernica is the Greatest Anti War Art Piece
  • Album of the Month June 2023
  • Album of the Month May 2023

Recent Comments

  1. A WordPress Commenter on Hello world!

Archives

  • June 2023
  • May 2023

Categories

  • Art Article
  • Current Album of the Month
  • Music
  • Past Album of the Month
  • Uncategorized
©2026 The Expressionist | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes.com